Manual testing has its pros and cons. While manual testing is an excellent option for exploratory, usability, UI, and ad-hoc testing, enterprises often find it challenging to manage test times with manual testing. Networked testing is a new concept that explains that software testing performs best when it uses integrated systems. Integrated systems here mean that they use collaborative networks of people who are constantly in sync, are highly orchestrated, and are capable of solving some of the world’s most challenging testing problems together. Under networked testing, there is also burstable testing, which is more specific. Burstable testing is a method of testing that uses relatively large teams of knowledgeable crowdsourced software testers who are available as needed.
The Need For Burstable Testing
Studies have found that even while full-time workers work more than eight hours daily at the office, only 40% are productive. To make things more complicated, staffing can be one of the biggest challenges regarding testing.
One of the many problems burstable testing solves is limited availability and overspending. These problems usually arise frequently due to staffing, as mentioned. Burstable testing leverages on-demand crowdsourced automation and manual testing teams to burst on/off the test surface as required.
Burstable Testing can also help with over-hiring problems that enterprises often deal with. Over-hiring happens when enterprises misjudge their testing needs due to fluctuating testing needs and end up hiring full-time QA and QE talent.
Components & Benefits Of Burstable Testing
Let us understand the elements that make Burstable testing:
a) Pre-trained professionals: Expert QA professionals must be screened, approved of, and trained on the application for testing to have an immediate impact.
b) On-demand resources: It is understood that testers must be prepared to work on short notice. But it is best to have a dedicated team of independent contractors when they can’t.
c) Distributed personnel: Remote testers can offer excellent personnel at reasonable costs, often spanning many time zones. It’s crucial to extend beyond office boundaries.
d) Large testing teams: While testing in bite-sized chunks, larger teams succeed as they can take up Testing on different variables (compared to traditional manual QA organizations). Engineering teams can speed up the process of releasing new products by using several testers to accomplish a week’s worth of quality work in just a couple of hours.
e) Aligned incentive models: Burstable Testing needs well-paid testers to uncover complex usability, functional, localisation, and other concerns. Pure bug bounty models frequently fail to succeed.
f) Collaborative problem solving: Burstable teams function as an entity in line with the principles of networked testing. A unified team of test leads, engagement managers, and testers collaborate to handle issues and difficulties.
g) Continuous learning methods: Burstable Testing generates a lot of data per time. Product, engineering, and quality teams must constantly learn from the tests and make necessary adjustments to emphasis, time, technique, coverage, and other factors.
How Is Burstable Testing Different From Traditional QA
Burstable Testing is widely known as a type of manual software testing, however, it differs from conventional manual techniques in many ways.
i) Rhythmic capacity management:
Manual testing methods have always proven difficult to staff. Frequently, there needs to be more availability or idle capacity (QA experts waiting for builds) (when pressure is high to release quickly). Burstable Testing solves this problem by using purposefully rhythmic patterns, allowing testers to switch between active and inactive states in response to demand.
ii) Fast testing execution:
The beauty of automated testing is speed. Test scripts can work well if they are correctly constructed and optimised. Businesses today have switched from manual to automated QA resources to deploy products more quickly. Nonetheless, script maintenance and development efforts occasionally result in bottlenecks. Burstable Testing promises to deliver testing turnaround times that are nearly automated at a fraction of the setup costs. Compared to typical manual testing, it may be substantially faster.